pédant$1$ - definitie. Wat is pédant$1$
Diclib.com
Woordenboek ChatGPT
Voer een woord of zin in in een taal naar keuze 👆
Taal:

Vertaling en analyse van woorden door kunstmatige intelligentie ChatGPT

Op deze pagina kunt u een gedetailleerde analyse krijgen van een woord of zin, geproduceerd met behulp van de beste kunstmatige intelligentietechnologie tot nu toe:

  • hoe het woord wordt gebruikt
  • gebruiksfrequentie
  • het wordt vaker gebruikt in mondelinge of schriftelijke toespraken
  • opties voor woordvertaling
  • Gebruiksvoorbeelden (meerdere zinnen met vertaling)
  • etymologie

Wat (wie) is pédant$1$ - definitie

DIVERGENT SERIES
1+1+1+···; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + · · ·; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + · · ·; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + …; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ...; Zeta(0)
  • alt=A graph showing a line that dips just below the ''y''-axis

pedant         
  • "The Pedant" by caricaturist [[Thomas Rowlandson]]
PERSONALITY TYPE; PERSON OBSESSED WITH DETAIL OR PROCESS, OFTEN NEGATIVELY PERCEIVED
Pedantry; Pedantic; Pædant; Pédant; Pedants; Pædants; Pédants; Paedant; Paedants; Pedantries; Pedanticism; Pedanthood
n.
1.
Schoolmaster, pedagogue.
2.
Vain scholar, conceited scholar, ostentatious man of learning.
pedant         
  • "The Pedant" by caricaturist [[Thomas Rowlandson]]
PERSONALITY TYPE; PERSON OBSESSED WITH DETAIL OR PROCESS, OFTEN NEGATIVELY PERCEIVED
Pedantry; Pedantic; Pædant; Pédant; Pedants; Pædants; Pédants; Paedant; Paedants; Pedantries; Pedanticism; Pedanthood
(pedants)
If you say that someone is a pedant, you mean that they are too concerned with unimportant details or traditional rules, especially in connection with academic subjects.
I am no pedant and avoid being dogmatic concerning English grammar and expression.
N-COUNT [disapproval]
pedantic         
  • "The Pedant" by caricaturist [[Thomas Rowlandson]]
PERSONALITY TYPE; PERSON OBSESSED WITH DETAIL OR PROCESS, OFTEN NEGATIVELY PERCEIVED
Pedantry; Pedantic; Pædant; Pédant; Pedants; Pædants; Pédants; Paedant; Paedants; Pedantries; Pedanticism; Pedanthood
If you think someone is pedantic, you mean that they are too concerned with unimportant details or traditional rules, especially in connection with academic subjects.
His lecture was so pedantic and uninteresting.
ADJ [disapproval]

Wikipedia

1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯

In mathematics, 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯, also written n = 1 n 0 {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }n^{0}} , n = 1 1 n {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }1^{n}} , or simply n = 1 1 {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }1} , is a divergent series, meaning that its sequence of partial sums does not converge to a limit in the real numbers. The sequence 1n can be thought of as a geometric series with the common ratio 1. Unlike other geometric series with rational ratio (except −1), it converges in neither the real numbers nor in the p-adic numbers for some p. In the context of the extended real number line

n = 1 1 = + , {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }1=+\infty \,,}

since its sequence of partial sums increases monotonically without bound.

Where the sum of n0 occurs in physical applications, it may sometimes be interpreted by zeta function regularization, as the value at s = 0 of the Riemann zeta function:

ζ ( s ) = n = 1 1 n s = 1 1 2 1 s n = 1 ( 1 ) n + 1 n s . {\displaystyle \zeta (s)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{n^{s}}}={\frac {1}{1-2^{1-s}}}\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {(-1)^{n+1}}{n^{s}}}\,.}

The two formulas given above are not valid at zero however, but the analytic continuation is.

ζ ( s ) = 2 s π s 1   sin ( π s 2 )   Γ ( 1 s )   ζ ( 1 s ) , {\displaystyle \zeta (s)=2^{s}\pi ^{s-1}\ \sin \left({\frac {\pi s}{2}}\right)\ \Gamma (1-s)\ \zeta (1-s)\!,}

Using this one gets (given that Γ(1) = 1),

ζ ( 0 ) = 1 π lim s 0   sin ( π s 2 )   ζ ( 1 s ) = 1 π lim s 0   ( π s 2 π 3 s 3 48 + . . . )   ( 1 s + . . . ) = 1 2 {\displaystyle \zeta (0)={\frac {1}{\pi }}\lim _{s\rightarrow 0}\ \sin \left({\frac {\pi s}{2}}\right)\ \zeta (1-s)={\frac {1}{\pi }}\lim _{s\rightarrow 0}\ \left({\frac {\pi s}{2}}-{\frac {\pi ^{3}s^{3}}{48}}+...\right)\ \left(-{\frac {1}{s}}+...\right)=-{\frac {1}{2}}}

where the power series expansion for ζ(s) about s = 1 follows because ζ(s) has a simple pole of residue one there. In this sense 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯ = ζ(0) = −1/2.

Emilio Elizalde presents a comment from others about the series:

In a short period of less than a year, two distinguished physicists, A. Slavnov and F. Yndurain, gave seminars in Barcelona, about different subjects. It was remarkable that, in both presentations, at some point the speaker addressed the audience with these words: 'As everybody knows, 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯ = −1/2.' Implying maybe: If you do not know this, it is no use to continue listening.